Hateoas Driven API Recipe
Your Use Case
You're not just documenting the API — you're using it:
- To operate a mesh manually, before clients exist.
- You need an executable interface, not just static documentation.
- You want structured examples (i.e. recipes) that can act as proto-clients or decision-paths.
- You lean toward HATEOAS style: i.e., user follows links (or rels), maybe inputting small bits along the way.
🔥 This is not what Scalar is designed for
Scalar is a docs tool, great for:
- Rendering OpenAPI reference UIs.
- Hosting and styling spec-based endpoints.
- Not for chaining calls, dynamic flows, or acting like a human-in-the-loop client.
Even Stoplight or RapiDoc start to feel clunky in your context, because what you’re actually describing is closer to:
> ✅ A human-usable API client with structured, composable, inspectable API macros or flows
🚨 So yes, you probably need to build something.
But here's how to think about it critically, so you don’t throw away everything or reinvent everything either.
🧠 What You Actually Want: A “HATEOAS Recipe Runner”
You’re describing a system that does the following:
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| 🔧 Embeds real OpenAPI | So you get type safety, endpoint listings, schemas, validation |
| 🧪 Can execute requests | Full HTTP interaction, possibly with state/cookies/token |
| 🪜 Supports recipes/flows | Sequence of calls, possibly branching via hypermedia |
| 🧵 Has local state/input | To reuse values from previous steps |
| 📎 HATEOAS link traversal | e.g. follow "next" or "create" link relations dynamically |
| 🧰 Deno/TS-native | So it integrates with your mesh, Weave, etc. |
| 🧭 Interactive + replayable | You can try things, backtrack, debug |
Your Use Case
You're not just documenting the API — you're using it:
- To operate a mesh manually, before clients exist.
- You need an executable interface, not just static documentation.
- You want structured examples (i.e. recipes) that can act as proto-clients or decision-paths.
- You lean toward HATEOAS style: i.e., user follows links (or rels), maybe inputting small bits along the way.
🔥 This is not what Scalar is designed for
Scalar is a docs tool, great for:
- Rendering OpenAPI reference UIs.
- Hosting and styling spec-based endpoints.
- Not for chaining calls, dynamic flows, or acting like a human-in-the-loop client.
Even Stoplight or RapiDoc start to feel clunky in your context, because what you’re actually describing is closer to:
> ✅ A human-usable API client with structured, composable, inspectable API macros or flows
🚨 So yes, you probably need to build something.
But here's how to think about it critically, so you don’t throw away everything or reinvent everything either.
🧠 What You Actually Want: A “HATEOAS Recipe Runner”
You’re describing a system that does the following:
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| 🔧 Embeds real OpenAPI | So you get type safety, endpoint listings, schemas, validation |
| 🧪 Can execute requests | Full HTTP interaction, possibly with state/cookies/token |
| 🪜 Supports recipes/flows | Sequence of calls, possibly branching via hypermedia |
| 🧵 Has local state/input | To reuse values from previous steps |
| 📎 HATEOAS link traversal | e.g. follow "next" or "create" link relations dynamically |
| 🧰 Deno/TS-native | So it integrates with your mesh, Weave, etc. |
| 🧭 Interactive + replayable | You can try things, backtrack, debug |
Your Use Case
You're not just documenting the API — you're using it:
- To operate a mesh manually, before clients exist.
- You need an executable interface, not just static documentation.
- You want structured examples (i.e. recipes) that can act as proto-clients or decision-paths.
- You lean toward HATEOAS style: i.e., user follows links (or rels), maybe inputting small bits along the way.
🔥 This is not what Scalar is designed for
Scalar is a docs tool, great for:
- Rendering OpenAPI reference UIs.
- Hosting and styling spec-based endpoints.
- Not for chaining calls, dynamic flows, or acting like a human-in-the-loop client.
Even Stoplight or RapiDoc start to feel clunky in your context, because what you’re actually describing is closer to:
> ✅ A human-usable API client with structured, composable, inspectable API macros or flows
🚨 So yes, you probably need to build something.
But here's how to think about it critically, so you don’t throw away everything or reinvent everything either.
🧠 What You Actually Want: A “HATEOAS Recipe Runner”
You’re describing a system that does the following:
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| 🔧 Embeds real OpenAPI | So you get type safety, endpoint listings, schemas, validation |
| 🧪 Can execute requests | Full HTTP interaction, possibly with state/cookies/token |
| 🪜 Supports recipes/flows | Sequence of calls, possibly branching via hypermedia |
| 🧵 Has local state/input | To reuse values from previous steps |
| 📎 HATEOAS link traversal | e.g. follow "next" or "create" link relations dynamically |
| 🧰 Deno/TS-native | So it integrates with your mesh, Weave, etc. |
| 🧭 Interactive + replayable | You can try things, backtrack, debug |
Your Use Case
You're not just documenting the API — you're using it:
- To operate a mesh manually, before clients exist.
- You need an executable interface, not just static documentation.
- You want structured examples (i.e. recipes) that can act as proto-clients or decision-paths.
- You lean toward HATEOAS style: i.e., user follows links (or rels), maybe inputting small bits along the way.
🔥 This is not what Scalar is designed for
Scalar is a docs tool, great for:
- Rendering OpenAPI reference UIs.
- Hosting and styling spec-based endpoints.
- Not for chaining calls, dynamic flows, or acting like a human-in-the-loop client.
Even Stoplight or RapiDoc start to feel clunky in your context, because what you’re actually describing is closer to:
> ✅ A human-usable API client with structured, composable, inspectable API macros or flows
🚨 So yes, you probably need to build something.
But here's how to think about it critically, so you don’t throw away everything or reinvent everything either.
🧠 What You Actually Want: A “HATEOAS Recipe Runner”
You’re describing a system that does the following:
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| 🔧 Embeds real OpenAPI | So you get type safety, endpoint listings, schemas, validation |
| 🧪 Can execute requests | Full HTTP interaction, possibly with state/cookies/token |
| 🪜 Supports recipes/flows | Sequence of calls, possibly branching via hypermedia |
| 🧵 Has local state/input | To reuse values from previous steps |
| 📎 HATEOAS link traversal | e.g. follow "next" or "create" link relations dynamically |
| 🧰 Deno/TS-native | So it integrates with your mesh, Weave, etc. |
| 🧭 Interactive + replayable | You can try things, backtrack, debug |
Your Use Case
You're not just documenting the API — you're using it:
- To operate a mesh manually, before clients exist.
- You need an executable interface, not just static documentation.
- You want structured examples (i.e. recipes) that can act as proto-clients or decision-paths.
- You lean toward HATEOAS style: i.e., user follows links (or rels), maybe inputting small bits along the way.
🔥 This is not what Scalar is designed for
Scalar is a docs tool, great for:
- Rendering OpenAPI reference UIs.
- Hosting and styling spec-based endpoints.
- Not for chaining calls, dynamic flows, or acting like a human-in-the-loop client.
Even Stoplight or RapiDoc start to feel clunky in your context, because what you’re actually describing is closer to:
> ✅ A human-usable API client with structured, composable, inspectable API macros or flows
🚨 So yes, you probably need to build something.
But here's how to think about it critically, so you don’t throw away everything or reinvent everything either.
🧠 What You Actually Want: A “HATEOAS Recipe Runner”
You’re describing a system that does the following:
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| 🔧 Embeds real OpenAPI | So you get type safety, endpoint listings, schemas, validation |
| 🧪 Can execute requests | Full HTTP interaction, possibly with state/cookies/token |
| 🪜 Supports recipes/flows | Sequence of calls, possibly branching via hypermedia |
| 🧵 Has local state/input | To reuse values from previous steps |
| 📎 HATEOAS link traversal | e.g. follow "next" or "create" link relations dynamically |
| 🧰 Deno/TS-native | So it integrates with your mesh, Weave, etc. |
| 🧭 Interactive + replayable | You can try things, backtrack, debug |
Your Use Case
You're not just documenting the API — you're using it:
- To operate a mesh manually, before clients exist.
- You need an executable interface, not just static documentation.
- You want structured examples (i.e. recipes) that can act as proto-clients or decision-paths.
- You lean toward HATEOAS style: i.e., user follows links (or rels), maybe inputting small bits along the way.
🔥 This is not what Scalar is designed for
Scalar is a docs tool, great for:
- Rendering OpenAPI reference UIs.
- Hosting and styling spec-based endpoints.
- Not for chaining calls, dynamic flows, or acting like a human-in-the-loop client.
Even Stoplight or RapiDoc start to feel clunky in your context, because what you’re actually describing is closer to:
> ✅ A human-usable API client with structured, composable, inspectable API macros or flows
🚨 So yes, you probably need to build something.
But here's how to think about it critically, so you don’t throw away everything or reinvent everything either.
🧠 What You Actually Want: A “HATEOAS Recipe Runner”
You’re describing a system that does the following:
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| 🔧 Embeds real OpenAPI | So you get type safety, endpoint listings, schemas, validation |
| 🧪 Can execute requests | Full HTTP interaction, possibly with state/cookies/token |
| 🪜 Supports recipes/flows | Sequence of calls, possibly branching via hypermedia |
| 🧵 Has local state/input | To reuse values from previous steps |
| 📎 HATEOAS link traversal | e.g. follow "next" or "create" link relations dynamically |
| 🧰 Deno/TS-native | So it integrates with your mesh, Weave, etc. |
| 🧭 Interactive + replayable | You can try things, backtrack, debug |
Your Use Case
You're not just documenting the API — you're using it:
- To operate a mesh manually, before clients exist.
- You need an executable interface, not just static documentation.
- You want structured examples (i.e. recipes) that can act as proto-clients or decision-paths.
- You lean toward HATEOAS style: i.e., user follows links (or rels), maybe inputting small bits along the way.
🔥 This is not what Scalar is designed for
Scalar is a docs tool, great for:
- Rendering OpenAPI reference UIs.
- Hosting and styling spec-based endpoints.
- Not for chaining calls, dynamic flows, or acting like a human-in-the-loop client.
Even Stoplight or RapiDoc start to feel clunky in your context, because what you’re actually describing is closer to:
> ✅ A human-usable API client with structured, composable, inspectable API macros or flows
🚨 So yes, you probably need to build something.
But here's how to think about it critically, so you don’t throw away everything or reinvent everything either.
🧠 What You Actually Want: A “HATEOAS Recipe Runner”
You’re describing a system that does the following:
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| 🔧 Embeds real OpenAPI | So you get type safety, endpoint listings, schemas, validation |
| 🧪 Can execute requests | Full HTTP interaction, possibly with state/cookies/token |
| 🪜 Supports recipes/flows | Sequence of calls, possibly branching via hypermedia |
| 🧵 Has local state/input | To reuse values from previous steps |
| 📎 HATEOAS link traversal | e.g. follow "next" or "create" link relations dynamically |
| 🧰 Deno/TS-native | So it integrates with your mesh, Weave, etc. |
| 🧭 Interactive + replayable | You can try things, backtrack, debug |
Your Use Case
You're not just documenting the API — you're using it:
- To operate a mesh manually, before clients exist.
- You need an executable interface, not just static documentation.
- You want structured examples (i.e. recipes) that can act as proto-clients or decision-paths.
- You lean toward HATEOAS style: i.e., user follows links (or rels), maybe inputting small bits along the way.
🔥 This is not what Scalar is designed for
Scalar is a docs tool, great for:
- Rendering OpenAPI reference UIs.
- Hosting and styling spec-based endpoints.
- Not for chaining calls, dynamic flows, or acting like a human-in-the-loop client.
Even Stoplight or RapiDoc start to feel clunky in your context, because what you’re actually describing is closer to:
> ✅ A human-usable API client with structured, composable, inspectable API macros or flows
🚨 So yes, you probably need to build something.
But here's how to think about it critically, so you don’t throw away everything or reinvent everything either.
🧠 What You Actually Want: A “HATEOAS Recipe Runner”
You’re describing a system that does the following:
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| 🔧 Embeds real OpenAPI | So you get type safety, endpoint listings, schemas, validation |
| 🧪 Can execute requests | Full HTTP interaction, possibly with state/cookies/token |
| 🪜 Supports recipes/flows | Sequence of calls, possibly branching via hypermedia |
| 🧵 Has local state/input | To reuse values from previous steps |
| 📎 HATEOAS link traversal | e.g. follow "next" or "create" link relations dynamically |
| 🧰 Deno/TS-native | So it integrates with your mesh, Weave, etc. |
| 🧭 Interactive + replayable | You can try things, backtrack, debug |
Your Use Case
You're not just documenting the API — you're using it:
- To operate a mesh manually, before clients exist.
- You need an executable interface, not just static documentation.
- You want structured examples (i.e. recipes) that can act as proto-clients or decision-paths.
- You lean toward HATEOAS style: i.e., user follows links (or rels), maybe inputting small bits along the way.
🔥 This is not what Scalar is designed for
Scalar is a docs tool, great for:
- Rendering OpenAPI reference UIs.
- Hosting and styling spec-based endpoints.
- Not for chaining calls, dynamic flows, or acting like a human-in-the-loop client.
Even Stoplight or RapiDoc start to feel clunky in your context, because what you’re actually describing is closer to:
> ✅ A human-usable API client with structured, composable, inspectable API macros or flows
🚨 So yes, you probably need to build something.
But here's how to think about it critically, so you don’t throw away everything or reinvent everything either.
🧠 What You Actually Want: A “HATEOAS Recipe Runner”
You’re describing a system that does the following:
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| 🔧 Embeds real OpenAPI | So you get type safety, endpoint listings, schemas, validation |
| 🧪 Can execute requests | Full HTTP interaction, possibly with state/cookies/token |
| 🪜 Supports recipes/flows | Sequence of calls, possibly branching via hypermedia |
| 🧵 Has local state/input | To reuse values from previous steps |
| 📎 HATEOAS link traversal | e.g. follow "next" or "create" link relations dynamically |
| 🧰 Deno/TS-native | So it integrates with your mesh, Weave, etc. |
| 🧭 Interactive + replayable | You can try things, backtrack, debug |